Suprameatal transvaginal approach to excision of urethral mesh erosion with urethroplasty

Burns J1, Rahman S1, Vasavada S1, Wallace S1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Urethra Male / Female

Abstract 264
Surgical Videos 3 - Male Incontinence and All Gender Urethral Reconstruction
Scientific Podium Video Session 28
Friday 9th October 2026
12:22 - 12:30
Parallel Hall 4
0.10 Sydney
Capacity: 265
Grafts: Synthetic Stress Urinary Incontinence Female Voiding Dysfunction Surgery
1. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Introduction
Erosion of mesh into the urethra is an uncommon complication of mid-urethral sling placement. Often surgical management is necessary, requiring not only removal of the affected mesh but also urethral repair or reconstruction. A suprameatal approach to excision can be used to limit the risk of postoperative urethrovaginal fistula formation.
Design
A 67-year-old female with a history of two incontinence procedures, including a synthetic mesh sling, presented with dysuria, mixed urinary incontinence, and urinary urgency. Of note, she was a long-term daily smoker with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. She was found by in-office cystoscopy to have a urethral mesh erosion and subsequently underwent mesh excision and urethroplasty via a suprameatal vaginal approach.
Results
Intraoperative findings revealed retropubic sling with ventral urethral mesh erosion, approximately 3 centimeters proximal to the urethral meatus, with no vaginal or bladder mesh exposure. The patient’s recovery was uncomplicated, with normal CT urogram following catheter removal 3 weeks postoperatively. She had complete resolution of her dysuria. She did experience persistent mixed incontinence symptoms, but deferred additional medical or procedural therapies.
Conclusion
A suprameatal approach to excision of urethral mesh erosion is preferred to limit the rate of fistula formation and recurrent stress incontinence. The ventral urethral attachments can be untethered from the pubic bone allowing for direct access to the mobilized urethra for mesh excision and urethral reconstruction.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd Exempt - no risk - case report Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI Not at all
Citation

Continence 19S (2026) 102741
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2026.102741

27/10/2026 11:09:46