Mini-invasive treatment with Vapor Therapy (Rezum) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: impact of early catheter removal on storage urinary symptoms and bother symptoms

Rubilotta E1, Aloe M1, Mancini G1, Casa P1, Giambalvo G1, Brunello D1, Caudana F1, Muscolino E1, Veccia A1, Bertolo R1, Antonelli A1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) / Voiding Dysfunction

Abstract 238
Male LUTS Prostate and more
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 26
Friday 9th October 2026
12:07 - 12:15
Parallel Hall 2
Brightlands Foyer
Capacity: 500
Anatomy Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Quality of Life (QoL) Conservative Treatment Bladder Outlet Obstruction
1. Department of Urology, A.O.U.I. Verona, Verona, Italy
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
To assess safety and reliability of catheter removal 5-days after Vapor Therapy Rezum (VTR)
procedure for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Study design, materials and methods
This was a prospective randomized trial held in our department between 2023-2025. Males
undergoing VTR for BPH were randomized into Group A (GA), catheter removal 5-days after
surgery, Group B (GB), catheter removal >7 days. Urinary retention (UR) episodes, discomfort/pain
at micturition in the first week after catheter removal were recorded with VAS, PGII, post-void urine
residual (PVR). The 1 and 3-mos follow-up included uroflowmetry with PVR, VAS for
pain/discomfort, PGII, IPSS, QoL, OAB screener, IIEF-5, MSHQ questionnaires. The reason for a
short f-up was that main adverse events related to shorter postoperative catheterization usually
occur in the first few months.
Results
Data were available on 124 males: 52 GA and 72 GB (mean age 66.4 y.o). In GA UR rate was
3.8%, in GB 6.9% (p:0.02), all episodes resolved in the first month. The discomfort amount in GA
was significantly lower than in GB (p:0.01). At 1 mos f-up, no statistical differences were found
between groups in IPSS (GA 12 vs GB 14, p:0.8), QoL (GA 3 vs GB 2.7, p:0.5), OAB screener (GA
29.3 vs GB 33.6, p:0.2), IIEF 5 (GA 10.4 vs GB 10.2, p:0.7), Qmax (GA 12.3 vs GB 12.5, p0.9),
PVR (GA 26.6ml vs GB 36.7 ml, p: 0.4), VAS discomfort/pain (GA 1.12 vs GB 1.14, p:0.9), PGII
(GA 2.5 vs GB 2.7, p:0.5), MSHQ-A (GA 9.7 vs GB 9.3, p:0.4), MSHQ-BH (GA 1.5 vs GB 1.9,
p:0.2). At 3-months f-up, statistical difference was achieved in OAB screener (GA 23.6 vs GB 31.5,
p:0.02), while no significant difference was found in IPSS (GA 7.4 vs GB 11, p:0.07), QoL (GA 1.6
vs GB 2.2, p:0.2), IIEF (GA 13 vs 12.5, p:0.5), Qmax (15.1 vs GB 14.5, p:0.3), PVR (GA 10ml vs
GB 23.6ml, p:0.2), VAS discomfort/pain (GA 0.75 vs GB 0.72, p:0.4), PGII (GA 2.3 vs GB 2.5,
p:0.9), MSHQ-A (GA 11.1 vs GB 9.8, p:0.2), MSHQ-BH (GA 1 vs GB 1.9, p:0.05).
Interpretation of results
To date, catheter removal time after VTR have not yet been standardized. Concerns about a
shorter duration of postoperative catheterization are related to inflammation of the prostate, which
may cause discomfort/pain, voiding dysfunction, storage symptoms, UR .Our data showed that
catheter removal at 5 days was safe and did not increased risk of immediate adverse events, nor
at 1 and 3 -mos follow-up, and did not negatively influence surgical results. Although the rate of
immediate UR was significantly higher in case of early catheter removal, this condition was
transient in all cases. Storage symptoms rate was not higher when catheter was removed early.
Even bothersome symptoms and pain were similar in the two groups. Therefore, a longer
catheterization time was not a protective factor for these symptoms. VTR is a minimally invasive
surgical therapy, aimed to reduce invasiveness. A long period of postoperative catheterization may
be opposite to the concept of minimally invasiveness and perceived by the patient as an obstacle to performing this procedure. Moreover, a longer duration of catheterization is a discomfort factor
for the patient negatively influencing the post-operative period. So, it is desirable to shorten the
post-operative catheterization.
Concluding message
Our data demonstrated that 5 days may represent a safe and adequate period of catheterization
after VTR because it does not increase the risk of adverse events and does not negatively impact
surgical outcomes.
Disclosures
Funding No funding or grant Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd . Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI Not at all
Citation

Continence 19S (2026) 102715
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2026.102715

01/11/2026 19:19:02