Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder Syndrome with Benign Prostatic Enlargement: A Promising Add-on Therapy when Pharmacotherapy is Limited

Liao C1, Chou E1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) / Voiding Dysfunction

Abstract 233
Male LUTS Prostate and more
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 26
Friday 9th October 2026
11:30 - 11:37
Parallel Hall 2
Brightlands Foyer
Capacity: 500
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Male Overactive Bladder Quality of Life (QoL) Prospective Study
1. Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
The coexistence of overactive bladder (OAB) with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) complicates approximately 60% of cases, representing a significant therapeutic challenge. In men, treatment must balance the relief of voiding symptoms with the preservation of detrusor contractility, a consideration less common in the management of female OAB.
Conventional antimuscarinics may impair bladder contractility, while beta-3 agonists are often contraindicated in patients with severe hypertension or are poorly tolerated due to adverse effects such as headache. Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) is a guideline-recognized, non-pharmacological option. We hypothesized that PTNS provides significant clinical benefit as an adjunctive treatment in male patients with BPE and OAB symptoms, avoiding the systemic side effects associated with standard pharmacotherapy.
This original study aims to evaluate the efficacy of add-on PTNS in male patients with OAB syndrome and coexisting voiding symptoms or BPE.
Study design, materials and methods
This single-arm prospective study included 54 male patients with OAB undergoing a standard PTNS protocol. Baseline evaluations included the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) to evaluate symptoms severity, along with objective prostate volume measurements to assess concurrent BPE. Longitudinal outcomes were tracked up to treatment Session 8. Primary outcome measures included changes in the OABSS and IPSS. To closely monitor micturition safety, the IPSS was further subdivided into storage and voiding sub-scores. Subjective quality of life was assessed using the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC). Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests, with significance defined as p < 0.05.
Results
A total of 54 male OAB patients (mean age 65.2±11.5 years) were included. Baseline assessments indicated moderate-to-severe symptoms: OABSS 8.74±3.16, IPSS 15.66±8.00, and PPBC 3.26±1.25. Among patients with available prostate volume (PV) data (n=40), 85.0% had a PV ≥20 ml (mean 35.68±15.77 ml), confirming clinical BPE. For patients with medication records (n=51), 78.5% required combination polypharmacy. (including antimuscarinics 72.5%, α-blockers 66.7%, and β3-agonists 60.8%). 
Following PTNS, storage symptoms improved rapidly and significantly. Mean OABSS decreased to 5.82±3.02 by Session 4 (p<0.001) and reached 3.82±3.10 by Session 8 (p<0.001). IPSS storage scores similarly improved from a baseline of 8.79±2.77 to 4.18±2.93 at Session 8 (p<0.001). PTNS demonstrated excellent voiding safety: IPSS voiding scores showed significant early improvement from 6.86±6.30 to 3.86±3.90 at Session 4 (p=0.008) and were safely maintained at 2.45±4.18 by Session 8, without inducing urinary retention. This significant symptom relief enhanced quality-of-life:  the proportion of patients reporting "very severe" PPBC problems dropped from 13.2% to 0% after only 3 sessions, while 54.6% reported "very minor/minor" issues by Session 8.
Interpretation of results
These findings demonstrated the clinical value of PTNS in managing complex male OAB. Our cohort represents a highly challenging population: a vast majority (85%) had concurrent prostatic enlargement, and nearly 80% relied on extensive LUTS polypharmacy. In such patients, conventional pharmacological treatments are often maximized, creating a strict clinical dilemma due to the risks of medication-induced voiding dysfunction and side effects.  Our study demonstrates that add-on PTNS therapy effectively breaks through these pharmacological limitations. It not only provides rapid and significant relief of storage symptoms but also safely minimizes the adverse effects of voiding dysfunction.
Concluding message
PTNS is an effective and safe non-pharmacological treatment for male OAB. In a complex cohort with concurrent BPE and polypharmacy, PTNS relieves storage symptoms and improves quality of life without compromising voiding function. It represents an ideal add-on therapy to overcome current pharmacological limitations in male LUTS management.
Figure 1 Efficacy of PTNS on Storage Symptoms and Preservation of Voiding Function
Figure 2 Shift in the Severity Distribution of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
References
  1. Optimizing tibial nerve stimulation: A short-course approach for overactive bladder treatment in Taiwanese patients
Disclosures
Funding The authors have no financial or personal relationships with commercial entities that could have influenced the results of this study. Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee China Medical University & Hospital Research Ethics Center, CMUH114-REC2-046 Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI For simple textual assistance in writing the abstract manuscript
Citation

Continence 19S (2026) 102710
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2026.102710

31/10/2026 06:09:06